The wrong question is “Do warm introductions work?” The useful question is “For this investor, do I have a credible, willing person who can improve the route without delaying the process?”
An introduction transfers context between people. It does not repair a stage mismatch, create investment capacity, or turn a weak business case into a strong one. Treat it as one possible route to a relevant recipient, not a qualification every founder must acquire.
Michael Seibel discourages excessive introduction-chasing when a direct email is possible. Preferences differ by recipient. YC's early-stage email guidance.
See which investors fit your startup
Add your website. We pick three investors who back companies at your stage, sector and market, with the evidence for each.
Evaluate the route on four independent dimensions
Relationship: does the proposed connector actually know the recipient, and in what context? A shared social-network connection is not enough. A former colleague who regularly speaks to the investor is different from someone who met them once.
Context: can the connector explain why the company might matter? They do not need to guarantee an investment, but should understand what they are forwarding. If they cannot describe the company accurately, first give them a short, factual explanation.
Permission: are they willing to make the introduction? Ask rather than treating their address book as an asset you control. Give them an easy way to decline. Do not put words of endorsement in their mouth.
Delay: what does waiting cost? Set an internal decision date. If the connector cannot act within your campaign window, consider a permitted direct route instead. Do not run both routes secretly at once.
A route can be strong on one dimension and weak on another. A close friend who does not know the investor has relationship strength with you, not with the recipient.
Use the investor's stated route when there is one
Check the firm's published process before inventing an elaborate network path. A submission form, pitch inbox, or stated preference may be the appropriate starting point. A useful contact can sometimes clarify that route without introducing you.
First Round values referrals and welcomes cold approaches. That does not establish a response rate or another firm's policy. First Round's outreach guidance.
Identify the right person with the partner map. An impressive introduction to someone outside the relevant team may create less progress than a straightforward submission to the correct channel.
Worked example: two paths, one decision
The following scenario is fictional. Fieldnote builds compliance-document software for small construction companies. It wants to approach Rowan Ventures, a relevant seed fund.
The founder knows Alex, a portfolio founder who worked with Rowan's partner during a difficult expansion. Alex understands Fieldnote's product, confirms a current relationship, and offers to ask whether the partner would like an introduction. That is a credible route. The founder provides a forwardable note and waits until their agreed check-in date.
A second possible connector is a conference acquaintance. They have the partner's email but cannot recall their last conversation and have not offered to help. The founder does not describe that as a warm connection. If Alex declines or cannot act, Fieldnote uses Rowan's published pitch form rather than collecting more distant intermediaries.
Now change one fact: Rowan only invests after a revenue threshold Fieldnote has not reached. Neither connector resolves that. The company should change its target list or ask whether a narrowly described exception exists—not escalate the introduction chain.
For direct approaches, use factual investor email subjects without implying a referral you do not have.
Write an introduction request that can be declined
A useful request states the company, why this recipient appears relevant, and exactly what help you want. Add a compact forwardable note containing only approved information. Make clear that the connector should forward it only if comfortable.
Do not ask them to claim they have diligenced the business, observed traction they have not seen, or decided it is a great investment. Their introduction can simply say they know you and believe the conversation may be relevant.
From shortlist to conversation produces both a direct draft and a permission-based introduction request from the same facts. Compare them before choosing one.
Pair the Intro Request skill with the Forwardable Note skill so the connector can review both the request and the company introduction.
Put a boundary around the search for access
A practical workflow is to identify a credible route, ask once, record a check-in date, and move on when the answer is no. These are operating choices, not proven conversion-rate optimizers. Do not repeatedly pressure a connector or approach multiple colleagues after a firm has declined.
Use outreach sequencing to keep a pending introduction from freezing the rest of your fundraising. Prepare your company in Find investors for your startup, save relevant investors, and track the chosen route manually. The product helps you organize candidates; it does not provide warm introductions or send requests on your behalf.
Prepared with AI assistance from linked primary sources. Workflows are editorial guidance; examples are fictional. Not financial or legal advice.
From shortlist to first meeting
Everything in Launch, plus help with the first email and the first call.
- Deck review
- First emails built on each investor's recent deals
- Meeting prep, phone numbers and CSV export